Facts on Recruiting -- Just for Coolbreeze Tigger

Question

Breezy,

To set the record straight I have referenced Bama and Barnie Recruiting for the past 4 years. Just so you will know what that means, this data includes 2008,2009,2010 and 2011. Stay with me now.

Auburn has ranked 20th, 19th, 4th and 7th for those years respectively.
Bama has ranked 1st, 1st, 5th and 1st for those years respectively. Stay with me now. you are bad about going into lala land.

The cumulative for barnie has been 12th, for Bama 2nd. If we were to add this year based on where the teams stand now, your average would be around 16th, and, of course, we would still be 1st or 2nd.

You may want to re-think your prediction about how good you are going to be this year, and next, and next. Many, many great programs are just simply ahead of you. Do not respond with your normal ramble. Go check the stats. They are real, and all the great teams ahead of you are certain to keep you nowhere near the top 10-15 programs in the country.

Winning starts with recruitment,(not the purchase) of players)

I almost forgot 42--14

Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 1

They did win the Chicken Shat Bowl ($1 to you).


Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 2

you are right, I guess I should give some credit. Naw...hell, I just can't...sorry
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 3

Man, I don't know if you are plain dumb or dulusional bammer. READ MY POST, BEFORE YOU ANSWER. Like I told you in my previous post you boy's had the number 1 class in 2008-2009 and we only had 14 players from our 2008-2009 team still with the team. 2010 WE DID HAVE THE NUMBER 4 class by rivals to you number 5. We had the number 3 to you 5 by scout. In 2011 you had number 1 by rivals and number 7 by scout. We had number 7 by rivals and number 1 by scont. Rivals did not add blakey to their ranking. This year you have 27 to our 16 commitments with both at 3.63 rating. We are going to blow you out of the water with our last 9 commitments. GET A GRIP BOY'S, YOU ARE NOT WAY AHEAD ON TALENT. You bammers lost 19 players on you 2 deep where we lost 5 player on our 2 deep. I don't know what else to say to you bammers except, you have a good WAR EAGLE day.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 4

all you did was repeat what I had already said about rankings. How mentally imbalanced can you be. I used the rivals rankings. Of course we can slice and dice them any way you want, we are still way ahead of you.

Breezy, continue to live in your dream world. The whole football world knows you are nowhere near the top teams in the sec. Your great coaching staff has shown for three consecutive years they do not know how to develop talent.

Auburn football established 140 years ago -- 1.5 national titles. It does not get more pathetic than this.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 5

Breezy is going to "blow us out of the water" with his last nine commitments. He is gonna shoot from 17th to 1st in recruiting. He also said we would be praying for points in the iron bowl, and lsu would beat us in the title game and many, many, many other idiotic, and wrong, predictions.

Breezy, there are not nine "good" players in all of america that want to play for auburn. Enter into reality boy. You lose by an average of 5 TOUCHDOWNS PER LOSS !!! WE HAVE WON MORE NATIONAL TITLES IN THREE YEARS (2) THAN YOU HAVE WON IN 140 YEARS OF PLAYING FOOTBALL. 1.5

EXPLAIN THIS. WHY ????
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 6

I have been calling you a man, but now I AM NOT SURE. you may be a boy or girl for all I know. But I DO KNOW THIS, you are not playing with a full deck if you do not think Auburn has had better recruiting years the last 2 years than you bammers. As far as this year, Auburn will be between 3 and 7 in this years class. As far as missing predicition, you said auburn would only win 4 games this year and virginia would beat us 42-7.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 7

sorry breezy, I never made a prediction on you and virginia. Nor, did I say you would only win 4 games. You are wrong again. give me a second.....I have to try to stop laughing. Breezy, you are blowing your wad before you gather the facts.

Again, your wonderful coaching staff did not just start recruiting this year. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE WITH THE 100 OR SO PLAYERS THEY HAVE RECRUITED SINCE CHEESE AND HIS STAFF HAVE BEEN THERE REPORTING TO PAT DYE AND DAVID NASAL ?

If you are a man, step up and answer that question. I have asked it about 10 times now, to which you just tuck your barnie arse and run from. Why are these 100 players playing at the dismal level in which they are playing??? (see ga, bama, arky, lsu, clemson scores)
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 8

I thought FSU had the #1 class last year.

Good game though. Congrats!
Originally posted on Open Forum by rjox1225.

Answer 9

rivals reflects bama 1st, fsu 2nd for 2011.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 10

When auburn pick up blakey, scout put auburn at 1. You picked virginia 42-6 and said auburn would only win 4 games last year. All those freshman making plays against virginia in the bowl game are going to be you bammers biggest nightmare in the next few years and then you will know what coached WAR EAGLE style is all about. By the way you are right about florida state, they outrecruited you last year too. They will probably be number 1 this year if they close strong.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 11

breezy, again, I never made a 4 win prediction, or picked virginia to beat you in the chicken shat bowl. Actually, I never thought too much about how a game would turn out between lower tier sec and acc teams. Had a national title game to be concerned with. Little man, you have me confused with someone else. sorry. Show me the link where I made these predictions.

However, I am still awaiting your explanation as to why you lose by 5 td's per game, what your coaches have done with the 100 or so recruits for past 3 years etc, etc. But, we all know you are to chicken shat to address these questions. Also, why has barnie never been able to win more than 1.5 titles in 140 years. Be a man, step up.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 12

How many real NC DO YOU BAMMERS have.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 13

Several more than you. Whether you call 2011 #14, #9 or whatever, it still stings that goober azz doesn't it?
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 14

You bammers would be better off claming 9 NC. That would put you top dog. But you boy's have to claim 14. If you claim 14 we claim 6. 1913,1957.1958.1983,2004,2011. We could claim 1993, but we want. All these are more creditable than your 1941NC where you were 9-2 and were 20th in the AP POLL.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 15

Well at first I would give your argument some credibility, but then I look at the years you claim and realize:

1958 NC: LSU
1983 NC: Miami
2004 NC: Southern Cal
2011 NC: Alabama (won just last week, I am assuming you mean 2010 here)

I will give you 1957 and 2010. I will even give you 1913. So that gives you what, three? Fine....9, 14, whatever, we still dominate your program in championships. Very foolish argument to make yet you goobs make it over and over and over again and keep losing it. Better idea would be to focus on why your program hasn't won more - and do something about it.
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 16

1) You have never finished #1 in recruiting as far as I remember
2) Nobody on rivals GAS about what ANYBODY on Scout was ranked
3) Nobody GAS how many NC's you want to claim. You will still never be on our level.
4) 99% of Bama fans dont even really care for 1941
5) It is funny that Auburn fans want to claim 2004 but laugh at our 1941
6) You are an idiot.
Originally posted on Open Forum by SP105.

Answer 17

No, you are the idiot, if you do not see the difference with our 2004 team to your 1941 team. Most of you bammers are to delusional to know the difference.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 18

There is no difference. 1941 is bogus. There are several others that we should and could claim (which makes your b!tching funy). 2004 we had a different system that we still use and you did not even play in the NC game. It would be the same as us claiming 1941. The very year that you b1tch about. Congrats. You are an idiot AND a hypocrite.
Originally posted on Open Forum by SP105.

Answer 19

Breezy, tell you what. Just for simplicity lets just cast out the titles that rub your arse so bad. Get those out of the way, just toss them, ok? We will count just those titles that were santioned by ap/upi and/or the BCS. Of course by doing it this way it eliminates your half title back during the korean war era. But the pre-bear titles will be tossed as well.

Now, chief, lets count. I believe that gives us 9, and you 1. You are the one who said we should count nine. There you have it.

Now, the last segment of our game will be for you and the other five tigger fans to brainstorm and see if you can agree that 9 titles compared to 1 title is not a comparison, but is rather alarming evidence as which program is best.

Nine for us, one for you breezy. Does that make your arse feel warm and fuzzy, or raw? which one breezy?
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 20

NOW thats funny, you count alabama AP NC IN 1961 but you don't count auburn AP NC in 1957. Boy's I say the best bet would be you bammers 9 to our 2. Those 9 are the most of any university in the modern era. You would be top dog. But we know that won't happen since Auburn and Penn state are the only 2 university that only count AP, UPI OR BCS titles. You bammers must be smaller in others parts to won't NC that you do not have. STAY THRISTY MY FRIENDS.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 21

sounds like you are idiot enough to be good with 9 vs 2. no wonder barnie never wins, the expectation level is sooo low.

I am doing all I can to accomodate your "chosen" numbers. Your national championship production over the years has been dismal at best
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 22

breezy, what does "stay thristy" mean? are you related to david "nasal" but just too skeered to admit it?
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 23

No boy' you are the idiot that you and you bammer buddy's can not accept only 9.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 24

breezy, I will be glad to accept nine if that makes you feel better. Any way you calculate the championships, guess what, barnie will come up short compared to bama. while you are doing the math, I am also requesting that you explain why we have won 22 sec titles to your 7. Again, why in the hell are you so far behing? I WANT AND EXPECT AN EXPLANATION !!!

Its like a dagger up that arse, that after chasing bama for 55 years to win a title, we sandwitched your arse in between 2 of our own. The team you hate so badly wrapped a couple titles around the only title you have ever won. This is hilarious !!!
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 25

IT's funny, you stated the 1 NC that Auburn won. Well have many NC HAS ALABAMA won. ONLY 3 TIMES have you bammers won a NC, 1992, 2009,2011. you lost 2 of your bowl games, you claim NC. I TELL YOU WHAT, I will not count our 1957NC IF YOU ONLY CLAIM THE ONES YOU WON ON FIELD. That would make it Bammers 3 to Auburn 1.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 26

sorry idiot. all the bryant nc's, stallings, and sabans were nationally awarded by the sanctioning bodies that oversaw the process at the respective time frames. We have won at a very minimum 9, and you have won a maximum of 2. You, nor I need to speak about the "robbed" bullshat. they were awarded, or they wasn't. Again, 9 to 2. Even the national media speaks about this. To further discredit your logic, the entire country (with exception to lee county) would agree to this scenario.

Forget about us and focus your attention to VANDY. They are a knats arse away from passing you in sec recruiting !!! A dog fight for 8th!!! WOW !!!
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 27

English. Speak it.
Originally posted on Open Forum by SP105.

Answer 28

Link: Samuel L Jackson - The Man
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 29

tlbama35, BET: Auburn will be in top . Put up or shut up.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 30

You sound like that little dumb arse boy at the school yard. 'cross that lien and I will beat you up".

Breezy, I will put up, but will never, never shut up. We are currently #1 in recruiting and you are #20. Don't change your original prediction. You said you would be # 1, or tied for #1. Yes, I will accept your challenge, and bet you will not be in, or tied for first. (you really need to think through this before you make your usual dumb arse response.) You will NOT be #1.

ONE WEEK LEFT AND YOU ARE FIGHTING WITH VANDY FOR EIGHTH IN CONFERENCE!!! First, seperate yourself from vandy, then you can pick your next oponent, perhaps miss state, ole miss, kentucky etc.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 31

No we will not be 1, because I AM NOT SURE HOW MANY COMMITMENTS, Auburn will have, but we will be a top 10.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 32

that is NOT what you said. You said, number 1, or tied for number 1. when you are called to task, you start back peddling. Since another one of your wild predictions have been exposed as "ignorance" looks as though you would be embarressed enough to stop making such claims. Claims that we bama fans know are not achieavable by barnie.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 33

You bammers may have 28 recriuts. We may not have 25. Let's see what the average for each recruit. We will be close to each other when recruiting is over.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 34

back peddling again I see.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 35

You bammers are not 1 right now. You have lost gulledge and taylor but rivals keeps them on your list so you bammers are 1. WHAT A JOKE .
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 36

oh breeeeezy, a joke is 21st, and right there with VANDY.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 37

I'VE HAVE ALREADY TOLD YOU THIS. But you remind me of a man that had 2 brains. One brain was lost and the other brain spent the rest of his life looking for it.
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 38

I am so impressed with the two brain analogy. Stay on point here please.

Why are you not showing more seperation between you and VANDERBILT ???
Are you too chicken shat to take specific issue with this question.
Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 39

Funny that you mention brains...you redefine dumbass.
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 40

Billy back, what a joke
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 41

Can you try that again...in English if you don't mind?
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 42

IT means your back billy, what a joke, or it could mean, billy get off my back, or it could mean;: HEY BILLY, you finally back posting .
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 43

Not surprisingly, none of those make any sense in this situation. Is it possible for you to post something other than nonsense? I've heard garbled radio traffic that is more coherent than some of your posts.

Surely even a goober like you isn't that unintelligent...not in this modern age. You have to be either too lazy to communicate effectively, or an act.
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 44

Communicate with a bammer : Lol
Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 45

Which is supposed to mean...?

I'm guessing you think that is some sort of a flame. Weak azz schitt if you ask me. Do better or GTFO.
Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.