In the past ten years, who has a more impressive resume than Auburn?

Question

Two SEC championships;
two NCs;
two undefeated seasons.....

Bama has two MNCs, but only one SEC and undefeated seasons.

Discuss....

Originally posted on Open Forum by HONKif...D4BAMA.

Comments

When was the last time bama won more than 2 in a row?

---

Hide and watch, boy! Hide and just watch them do it!

---

hide and watch what? you guys really believe we have an interest in a pussy team like the auburnettes.

Georgia, LSU, Arkansas, Clemson and the mighty tide showed you little pussies that you are not

worth watching. Learn to play defense then come back and make an appointment to talk to the big

boys. In the interim be proud to be neck and neck all time with Fuvckenn Vandy !!!!

---

I think you're upset that AU has the better program over the past ten years.

2SECC to bama's 1
2 undefeated seasons to bama's 1
7 IB victories to bama's 3

And Gene hasn't even gotten his streak going yet.

---

who is gene? is he suppose to be a coach or something? and, why are the 2 auburnette

fans so fixed on selective time frames? the dumb ass breezy likes the 30 year scenario

while honk bag prefers the past 10 years.

since we are slicing it up that way would it be fair for me to bring 3 of the past 4 years to

their attention? How do you guys feel about that little timeframe? Pisses you now don't it.

---

By the way, I'm sure you aren't bright enough to realize this or look it up, but the last time Bama won two in a row over Auburn was 2008 and 2009. The latter I am sure you remember because it was #13 and burned your ass pretty badly.

For the record - you have to go back to 2006-2007 to find the last time Auburn won two in a row.

Meanwhile, we have enjoyed 3 out of 4. Especially the 2008 and 2011 blowouts.

Your impending meltdowns this fall should be epic and enjoyable. Looking forward to it.

Answer 1

auburn, 2 national championships in past ten years? awarded by whom?

Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 2

Awarded by me, num nuts. If you bammers claim 1941, we claim 1913,1958,1983,1993,2004.

Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 3

Hey tlbama35, I posted on 4 different post the same thing this auburn tiger is saying and you told me not one other auburn person agreed with me . We are the auburn tigers, you daddy for the past 10-30 years.

Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 4

Honk, suprised you are able to walk around upright after the continous bleeding from your vajj since 1/9. Keep it up, the volume of tampax and midol purchases in Lee county have helped a few companies bottom lines this quarter.

BTW: you can't claim the '04 title if you didn't play in the BCSCG.

Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids.

Originally posted on Open Forum by dustinator.

Answer 5

Am I the only one who notices (and laughs) that this moron says AU wins "NCs" but Bama wins "MNCs"? I am sure the gaping hatchet wound of a man will blame it on his iPad (a device far too complex for him to use) but it says a lot about his mentality. And the mentality of most goobers.

I will admit, you goobs might have more hardware if you could convince Cheezedick to put down the milk bottle and coach the DBs for a few minutes during the fall. He's paid to coach football, not coddle baby calves.







He doesn't have any teeth either!

Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 6

Go to the freaking barner board and brag on the boogs. No one over here should give a rat's arse.

Originally posted on Open Forum by NCTider.

Answer 7

all this is sooo funny. the post starts out crazy, auburn two national titles in ten years. Correction: 1.5 titles in about 130 years.

Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 8

You bammers can't handle the fact that in the 1960-1970's when dad-da took you to all the bammers games, he told you boy's it would alway's be like those years, but dad-da lied and AUBURN has been your daddy for the last 30 years. For the last 10, AUBURN has been your daddy and mama.

Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 9

^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^

Notice how they act like 2004 is a joke? Take away all their "joke MNCs" and your'e left with what, 5?

Course they still claim 14...
Now THAT is a joke!

This post was edited on 2/10 10:00 AM by HONKifUvCOACHED4BAMA

Originally posted on Open Forum by HONKif...D4BAMA.

Answer 10

Why group in acomplishments of your best HC ever (wingnut) with one of the worst ( and current HC) in SPAPI history?

Doesnt matter what Tubberville, Carnell, Ronnie, Campbell, $cam did. They are long gone... They are no more relevant to the current state of the goober program than Bryant, Namath Stable, Newsome, Musso are to ours. SPAPI is now what you saw on the field in the last 6 months.

Reality is ONLY what chiz has accomplished with his players vs what Saban has accomplished with his in the same time frame.

Outside of the 3 month rental of $cam, No difference in API and Miss St. The entry of aTm pushes them back to a battle for 5th in the SECW.

Here is a a reality check for ye.... The #3 team in your division now considers API to be an AUTOMATIC BLOWOUT WIN. That is fact!

My advice to the cult would be to first get competitive ( within 4 TDs)of the top3 in your division. The we might entertain your goober delusions.

Originally posted on Open Forum by Bama_Gator.

Answer 11

When have you ever been right about auburn in your life gator, You said auburn would win only 4 games last year. We only lost 5 srs. on our 2 and 3 deep depth charts. We were the youngest team in college football last year. You boy's,ark,ga, and lsu lost major talent. You are the one delusional if you do not think AUBURN WILL BE MUCH NEXT YEAR.

Originally posted on Open Forum by coolbreeze tiger.

Answer 12

I think it speaks volumes for your true expectations that you rag on someone for prediction that AU would go 4-8 last year with the fact they went 7-5. (Note for comparisons sake we aren't including your very impressive Chicken Shat Championship)

Face it, you went 7-5 but almost started the season 0-2 to two inferior teams. A trick play against a sorry Utah State team and the MSU QB not snapping the ball quickly enough are the only things that saved you from going over to Clemson 0-2...imagine how thorough the drubbing in Death Valley could have been then.

You were fortunate and admittedly stuck to it through September (this is before just laying down in blowout losses against better teams, like LSU) but to think that your team was much better than Gator's preseason prediction is pure delusion. Auburn 2011 was far more lucky than good.

Originally posted on Open Forum by billywayneluck.

Answer 13

I am still in shock at what level of an idiot it takes to initiate a thread like this. The thread comes right out of the gate with a lie, 2 national titles...yeah right. This only brings attention to your futile attempt to make your little program look relevant.

Any time you idiots want to look at awarded championships, half or whole, lets do it. we still swamp your red headed arse.

A better thread would be "how many teams have a better resume in regard to beating down the auburnettes than bama, lsu, arky and ga during the past few years. Wanna go down that street? Didn't think so.

All is dayam good in lee county. hell, by signing 18-20 players a year no telling what may happen.

Originally posted on Open Forum by tlbama35.

Answer 14

Originally posted by HONKifUvCOACHED4BAMA:
When was the last time bama won more than 2 in a row?

Who cares? When was the last time Auburn won two NCs in three years?

Answer 15

Originally posted by HONKifUvCOACHED4BAMA:
I think you're upset that AU has the better program over the past ten years.2SECC to bama's 12 undefeated seasons to bama's 17 IB victories to bama's 3And Gene hasn't even gotten his streak going yet.

Interesting that you leave off BCS championships, where the facts aren't in your favor. For some reason, that will be different, I'm sure.

Also Gene's streak may not be what you think it is - be careful what you wish for you may not like it.

Answer 16

Originally posted by tlbama35:
who is gene? is he suppose to be a coach or something?

I will tell you what I do know about him. He has no teeth and whoever picks out his shirts must be blind.

Answer 17

Originally posted by billywayneluck:
By the way, I'm sure you aren't bright enough to realize this or look it up, but the last time Bama won two in a row over Auburn was 2008 and 2009. The latter I am sure you remember because it was #13 and burned your ass pretty badly.For the record - you have to go back to 2006-2007 to find the last time Auburn won two in a row.Meanwhile, we have enjoyed 3 out of 4. Especially the 2008 and 2011 blowouts.Your impending meltdowns this fall should be epic and enjoyable. Looking forward to it.

Speaking of not being bright enough, the question I asked was MORE THAN two in a row, genius. Go back and read it slowly.

I LMAO at you dumbasses when you try to seem clever. Y'all need to stick to your nose-picking false claims of MNCs. Sure, they are a joke but at least you won't fukc up the same tired story.

Answer 18

no matter what the topic is the little auburn fans will always attack our championships. How pitiful it must be to live a life that miserable. They say we "claim" fake titles. We do not claim shat. we have been awarded 9 championships in the post bowl era. Yes awarded. That is 8 more than the little split tails from lee county has been awarded. If my team was in a virtual dead heat with fckingg Vandy, and I was occupying a seat right next to ole piss and ga tech in all time sec titles I would be pissed just like they are. This is so funny. Watching them bustards try to make believe their way above us. Keep talking you two. I love laughing at your dumb asses

Answer 19

Originally posted by tlbama35:
no matter what the topic is the little auburn fans will always attack our championships. How pitiful it must be to live a life that miserable. They say we "claim" fake titles. We do not claim shat. we have been awarded 9 championships in the post bowl era. Yes awarded. That is 8 more than the little split tails from lee county has been awarded. If my team was in a virtual dead heat with fckingg Vandy, and I was occupying a seat right next to ole piss and ga tech in all time sec titles I would be pissed just like they are. This is so funny. Watching them bustards try to make believe their way above us. Keep talking you two. I love laughing at your dumb asses

1

A big Roll Tide to that!

Answer 20

You two little bammers are all that's left to take up for the bammer nation. This is a sad day bammers.

Answer 21

Originally posted by coolbreeze tiger:
You two little bammers are all that's left to take up for the bammer nation. This is a sad day bammers.

Not much to be sad about. Beautiful day, Bama is at the top of the football world, busy but good times at work. Couldn't ask for much more. Not sure why I should be sad - but I can think of a lot of reasons why you and your buddy honkif would be.

Answer 22

piss poor coach, can't recruit with the big boys, the master beats their ass at everything he does, the absolute worst defense of a national title as any team in history, loses five games by an average of 6 fcvckong touchdowns per loss, a defense so weak it cannot tacke a fart, in a dead heat with Vandy all time, fifth or sixth best all time sec record, 1 AWARDED title in the past 50 dayam years.

Breez n honk -- can you say master bama, master georgia, master arkansas, master lsu, master clemson, and most importantly make sure you can say MASTER SABAN !!!

Answer 23

Even sadder is the fact that they don't know wtf they're talking about. Bama doesn't have 9 in the POST BOWL era. I count '79, '92, '09 and '11 ...
Course '09 & '11 are tainted with all the cheating the munchkin has done but, to be fair. Bama does have 2 that are indiputed.

Answer 24

Originally posted by HONKifUvCOACHED4BAMA:
Even sadder is the fact that they don't know wtf they're talking about. Bama doesn't have 9 in the POST BOWL era. I count '79, '92, '09 and '11 ...Course '09 & '11 are tainted with all the cheating the munchkin has done but, to be fair. Bama does have 2 that are undisputed.
This post was edited on 5/7 4:33 AM by HONKifUvCOACHED4BAMA

^^^ more drivel from a fan who hasn't won many NCs ^^^

Win more, suck less, and you won't have to embarrass yourself with posts like the above.

Answer 25

No one in america discounts alabama's nine titles post bowl era except the auburn fans.

I noticed also that you use the "I count" analogy just like that other sick fuvckr. They are

tainted, I count this, I count that. Bottom line -- NINE TO ONE !!! Discussing our titles

with you little inferior people is like pulling barbed wire out of your ass. Get used to it.

The little auburnettes are just not very good. Word of advice, ever heard of picking your

own battles? Don't attempt to debate us abount national or sec titles. It just will not work

in your favor. The football world laughs when you wage this war, boy.

Answer 26

Originally posted by tlbama35:
Word of advice, ever heard of picking your own battles? Don't attempt to debate us abount national or sec titles. It just will not work in your favor. The football world laughs when you wage this war, boy.

Goobs: If you learn nothing else from this thread, learn this.

Answer 27

I know you really don't know shite about them, so I'll school you on them this one time...

You can thank me later.

1925 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with
Dartmouth. Who awarded the NC? Houlgate and Helms. Houlgate started his system
in 1927. So Bama won their 1925 NC using a formula that didn't exist until 1927?
Helms Athletic Foundation started in 1941. Another incredible retroactive
NC.

The Associated Press Poll has been active since 1936. The AP took their final
poll prior to bowl games from 1936 ? 1964 and in 1966 and 1967. They took their
final poll after the bowl games in 1965 and from 1968 ? Current.

1926 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with 3 other
teams with equal or better records! Once again it is the Helms Athletic
Foundation in 1941 that awards it!

1930 National Championship- The Davis poll says that Bama tied Notre Dame for NC this year. This was the only one to
award it to Bama. Notre
Dame was named NC in 6 polls! Parke Davis is another retroactive system!
He (an individual, not an organization) did his in 1933!

1934 National Championship- Alabama says they share this with two other
teams. The awarders are Dunkel, Williamson, and Football Thesaurus. Dunkel was
an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who
came up with his own system. Football Thesaurus first appeared in 1946!

1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke. The AP ranked Alabama
20th in the nation with 14 teams with better records in the top 20. Once again
it is the Football Thesaurus that retroactively awards it. Alabama finished 3rd
in the SEC that year. Mississippi State won the SEC title..yet Bama claims a
National title!

1961 National Championship- Finally a legitimate NC. .

1964 National Championship- While the AP did award the NC to Bama (10-1-0),
Arkansas had the better record, 11-0. Alabama
played Texas in their bowl and LOST. The AP final
poll was before the bowl.

1965 National Championship- The AP gave this to Bama. That year there were
three teams with better records than Bama. Bama 9-1-1, Michigan St 10-1-0, Arkansas 10-1-0, Nebraska
10-1-0.

1973 National Championship- AP puts Bama 4th after their bowl game loss. Bama
claims a NC from the UPI poll that was taken
before they met Notre Dame in the bowl game and
lost. There were 3 teams with better records than Bama that year. The
embarrassment of naming Alabama number one caused the UPI to name champions
after bowl games. Yet Bammer has no shame in claiming it of course.

1978 National Championship- AP gives this to Alabama(11-1-0) even though USC
(12-1-0) had the better record Guess who Alabama lost to that year?
USC!!!!!!!!!. UPI gave the NC to USC.

1979 National Championship- Their second legitimate NC. Their first Unanimous
NC.

1992 National Championship- Their third legitimate NC. Their second Unanimous
NC.

2009 National Championship Their forth legit NC and third unanimous.

2011 National Championship They didn't even win their conference division....

You can see why people ridicule Bama fans when they talk about 14 NCs. The
early ones were awarded by individuals years after the games were played. These
weren't consensus polls but NCs awarded by people that had their own formula for
determining champions. Some NCs were given before bowl games that Bama lost.
Using Alabama logic, Auburn could claim 7 national championships. But when
Bammers brag they like to say they have fourteen and Auburn has one. How silly.
The NCAA recognizes 8 NCs for Bama and there are
only four NCs that Bama has unanimously. You can't find an Auburn site claiming
four national championships but there are plenty Bama sites claiming fourteen.

Debunking the Alabama National Championship myths.

Bama�legends in their own minds!

Answer 28

you got it right...nine since the bryant era. This extensive write up

only confirms your outright obsession with bama. No bama fan

would take this much time to outline auburns success, but then again,

it would only take one line wouldn't it? Now, your next assignment. I

want you to provide the link to any documented media link that extracts

any of the nine from bama. We know you inferior aubie fans doubt them,

but you need to show where they were documented as awarded in error

or tainted to use the words we hear from (only) the aubies. Keep your

reserch limited to the nine most recent. I don't want you spending more

than a day on this, although we can see you are honored to research

bama. Your final analysis will reveal, and confirm, NINE TO ONE.

Answer 29

one other tidbit. you acknowledge the ncaa recognizes eight for bama.

How does that compare to auburn? Just wondering if you may be willing

to further expand? Even using your numbers, the comparison just isn't

there is it? I told you this yesterday in a short thread. Your continued

failed efforts to make the numbers look less than significant when

compared to auburns only further confirms your stupidity and dangerous

level of jealousy. Keep writing, I 'll keep laughing.

Answer 30

Every time I see the diatribe on our NCs I know he goobs are incensed that their program doesnt measure up. Just another display of the loser mentality inherent in our resident goobs.

Imagine what would happen if they focused their attention on helping Auburn win rather than Alabama losing. They might finally break the deadlock with ole miss and bandy! Lol

Answer 31

I have challenged them several times to show proof that any of our most

recent nine titles have been officially declared incorrect due to their favorite

reasons such as being tainted, cheating by the munchkin, not winning the

conference etc. Needless to say they are not capable of backing up their

weak claims therefore their pitiful attempt to discredit our titles has failed,

and will continue to fail.

Honk you have one last chance to substantiate your claim and make

yourself famous with the other auburnettes. Send me proof little man where

any of the nine titles have been taken away. It would be an outright shame

to let your 15 paragraph rampage be considered a worthless effort. We

really appreciate the recap but we already knew how many we had won. Now,

and for the second time I am telling you to back up your claim. Otherwise we

are where we have said we were all along. NINE TO ONE.

Answer 32

Alright, Billy..... Youre not a bad flamer..... But, How long you gonna give this dumbphuck a free paas? It's bad enough the lame mofo reiterates basically the same fukcin post every time, but wtf is up with the double spacing?

Does the stupid sumbitch think an English teacher is coming in here at night to make sure he has a FULL PSGE of worthless drivel to read?

Answer 33

I see you are mad...where is the documented evidence I asked for? 9--1

Answer 34

Originally posted by tlbama35:
I see you are mad...where is the documented evidence I asked for? 9--1

Fat chance of getting a response to that one. Honkif and Breezy are too busy trying to pick gnat shit out of pepper through slinging their bullshit and throwing up their lame ass red herrings.

They know the score, that's why they try to change the discussion to some nonsense of their own selection in an attempt to get a win. Shame they don't put the same effort into getting Goober U a decent coach, or maybe contributing to the player slush fund to try and buy another QB.

Isn't it amazing how quickly Nick Saban ended the "Golden Age" of Auburn football, running Wingnut out of town on a rail? At the end of the day 2010 will be the only bright spot in Cheezedicks tenure, and only because they had a once in a generation player on the team.

Answer 35

Looks as though honk is fake also. no evidence = Nine titles. Burns that ass huh.

Answer 36

honk, where is the evidence that discredits our 9 titles? Back up your claim, boy!

Answer 37

Originally posted by tlbama35:
honk, where is the evidence that discredits our 9 titles? Back up your claim, boy!

That diatribe of his was just copied from the Goober open forum and das Booonker. It's been posted over and over again and is just as funny today as it was years ago.

Answer 38

looking back at them in our rear view mirror I see some miserable little people

Answer 39

Honk, good work. While the little bammers a looking in the mirrow, AUBURN just left them in the dust like we have for the last 10-20-30- years.

Answer 40

Originally posted by coolbreeze tiger:
Honk, good work. While the little bammers a looking in the mirrow, AUBURN just left them in the dust like we have for the last 10-20-30- years.

I put it up there for the dumbfux to read but they're still asking for it... They have '79.'92(though there is strong evidence they were cheating then with Cheating Gene and Logan running loose) And they have two MNCs while on probation in '09 and '11....

Now if ^^^^ that's^^^^ not a fair assessment from an unbiased observer, there has NEVER been one...

And why do they keep asking me to explain it again?

Maybe

if

I

double

space

the whole

damn

thing

they

will

get it?

Answer 41

not your proof dumb ass, official proof. where is it? Nine to 1. get over it

Answer 42

I can easily see ole honk is very pissed. he is losing his cool. soooo funny !!!

Answer 43

Originally posted by tlbama35:
I can easily see ole honk is very pissed. he is losing his cool. soooo funny !!!

More than you know! Everyone knows he's a joke and embarrassment. Well, everyone except breezy.

Answer 44

Originally posted by tlbama35:
not your proof dumb ass, official proof. where is it? Nine to 1. get over it

Those records ARE official proof that most of the MNC's are a sham.

There! How's tha?

Answer 45

I want the official press release. Short of that, stfu.

Answer 46

We have auburns distorted opinion. Where is the evidence we were stripped of those titles?

Answer 47

Originally posted by tlbama35:
We have auburns distorted opinion. Where is the evidence we were stripped of those titles?

TL, let's invite these two buffoons to the Bryant Museum where they can see all of the relevant hardware on display. I think that's better proof than a press release that these guys couldn't fully read, don't you?

Even Cro-magnon man can recognize the hardware when he sees it.

Answer 48

I do agree.

Answer 49

you got 4 legit.

Eat it!

Answer 50

so, shall we say 4 to 1? does that do you proud idiot?